Textual criticism is the method used by the High Priest for conforming ancient documents to a contemporary format in which they will be most persuasive to the current generation of readers. The High Priest is responsible for the public mind.
Historically, textual criticism has been performed in two ways:
- grouping existing manuscripts of an author into families with one derived from another
- by comparison of manuscripts, it is possible to draw inferences as to their lost ancestors or archetypes, their condition, and even their pagination.
Rules and Canons for Textual Criticism of Ancient Text
The rule for constructing a family tree of manuscripts is that, apart from accident, identity of reading implies identity of origin. However, when a scribe copied a manuscript from one early source and corrected it against another, the genealogical relations among them become progressively more complex and obscure.
Finnegan summarized the Canons of Tischendorf for textual criticism as follows. The canons were drafted for use in textual criticism of the New Testament, but there is no reason why they cannot be used, mutandis mutatis, in other spheres, such as in psychoanalytic interpretation.
- Elizabeth Levin Psychology
- Ap Essay Psychology
- Psychology Career
- Beverly Gay Green Issue Lesbian Psychology
Psychological Perspectives on Lesbian and Gay Issues. Edited by Gregory M. Herek and Beverly Greene. Sage Publications.
- Journal Of Comparative Physiology And Psychology